1 min read

Are online inductions simply no more than just a box-ticking exercise?

Q: Many organisations provide contractor inductions through an online system that the contractor completes before they come on site. Given that a contractor may do a site induction some weeks before attending the site, and have probably attended other worksites and inductions in between, is this a credible way to deliver inductions that would hold up in court? To me it seems like a box-ticking exercise that could easily be interrogated and found inadequate.

A: This is a difficult question to answer as not all systems are the same, and it will depend a lot on the content and purpose of the induction. We are assuming that the induction of the contractor you are referring to is a site-specific induction by a principal, or principal contractor, to ensure that the contractor is familiar with the risks on the site.

Online induction tools can be very effective but, like with all online tools, it is important to consider how the organisation uses the tool and what, if any, additional systems are used to ensure the safety of the contractor coming to the site.

Please note: The answer is correct at the time of publishing. Be aware that laws may change over time. Refer to Training and induction for current advice.

Subscribe to the Health & Safety Bulletin

From the experts behind the Health & Safety Handbook, the Bulletin brings you the latest work health and safety news, legal updates, case law and practical advice straight to your inbox every week.

Sending confirmation email...
Great! Now check your inbox and click the link to confirm your subscription.
Please enter a valid email address!